← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Hastings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 26 0 3 3 0.115 0.0445 0.0494 0.1681 0.1867
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 54 11 6 17 0.315 0.1213 0.1213 0.4587 0.4587
2020-21 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 10 2 1 3 0.300 0.1066 0.1066 0.3150 0.3150
2021-22 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 49 3 7 10 0.204 0.0786 0.0754 0.2974 0.2855
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 60 10 27 37 0.617 0.2191 0.2043 0.6475 0.6037
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 18 0 2 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2025-26 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
-15.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34454
Forward overall
#2064
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2017-18
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2014-15
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.