← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danny Cavanagh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Winchendon NE-Prep 28 7 7 14 0.500 0.1008 0.1008 0.2288 0.2288
2019-20 Winchendon NE-Prep 26 18 12 30 1.154 0.2326 0.2326 0.5281 0.5281
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.1857 0.1857 0.5294 0.5294
2021-22 South Shore Kings NCDC 36 8 11 19 0.528 0.1487 0.1386 0.4273 0.3983
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 3 11 14 0.518
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 20 2 5 7 0.350
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 14 3 1 4 0.286
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 12 2 3 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2022-23 · Babson
+176.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26806
Forward overall
#1039
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2009-10
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.