IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Yarber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 57 8 5 13 0.228 0.0838 0.0853 0.2408 0.2452
2008-09 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 58 12 9 21 0.362 0.1330 0.1288 0.3822 0.3702
2009-10 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 48 18 14 32 0.667 0.2449 0.2274 0.7037 0.6533
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 27 10 8 18 0.667
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 20 6 7 13 0.650
2011-12 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 26 7 13 20 0.769
2010-11 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 20 5 7 12 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2010-11 · Wentworth
+272.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30089
Forward overall
#999
Forward born in 1989
#2712
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Menzies
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barone
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.