IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — NAHL 35 1 1 2 0.057 0.0210 0.0210 0.0603 0.0603
2021-22 — NAHL 56 5 7 12 0.214 0.0787 0.0757 0.2262 0.2177
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 17 5 7 12 0.706
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 27 3 5 8 0.296
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 26 7 5 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2022-23 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+612.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#55520
Forward overall
#3413
Forward born in 2001
#6430
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Mazur
Keene State · 2023-24
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Dixon
UMass Boston · 2012-13
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Grant Reichenbacher
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.