← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Reichenbacher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 USHL 38 0 2 2 0.053 0.0310 0.0317 0.1580 0.1615
2017-18 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 33 0 5 5 0.151 0.0894 0.0869 0.4550 0.4424
2018-19 Chippewa Steel NAHL 60 8 18 26 0.433 0.1592 0.1526 0.4573 0.4384
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 26 4 6 10 0.385
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 30 8 9 17 0.567
2020-21 Augsburg D1 MIAC SO 5 2 3 5 1.000
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 5 2 3 5 1.000
2019-20 Augsburg D1 MIAC FR 26 10 3 13 0.500
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 26 10 3 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2019-20 · Augsburg
+362.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40091
Forward overall
#2090
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2011-12
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2017-18
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.