← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Pfister Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 48 0 1 1 0.021 0.0076 0.0076 0.0220 0.0220
2021-22 NAHL 55 3 13 16 0.291 0.1069 0.1105 0.3070 0.3175
2022-23 NAHL 44 0 7 7 0.159 0.0585 0.0576 0.1679 0.1654
2023-24 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 57 3 13 16 0.281 0.1031 0.0966 0.2963 0.2777
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 27 2 2 4 0.148
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 19 2 4 6 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Stout
+312.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17371
Defenseman overall
#3115
Defenseman born in 2003
#5355
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.