IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shawn Bartlette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 55 16 16 32 0.582 0.2067 0.1893 0.6137 0.5619
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 28 4 4 8 0.286
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 26 4 6 10 0.385
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 26 5 6 11 0.423
2004-05 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 27 8 5 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2004-05 · St. Scholastica
+197.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23817
Forward overall
#721
Forward born in 1983
#1782
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carson Kelley
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Bobrow
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.