← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Kunz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-13 Country: USA
2020 · Round 4, Pick #113  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.5899 0.6588 3.0034 3.3544
2019-20 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1180 0.6007 0.6007
2020-21 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 50 23 20 43 0.860 0.5073 0.5073 2.5829 2.5829
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 36 7 8 15 0.417
2023-24 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 37 9 10 19 0.513
2022-23 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 24 5 0 5 0.208
2021-22 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 31 3 3 6 0.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.61
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2021-22 · North Dakota
-68.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 25 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5179
Forward overall
#214
Forward born in 2002
#256
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Air Force (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Boston University (1.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.