IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Cullinan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Taft NE-Prep 25 10 6 16 0.640 0.1235 0.1235 0.2929 0.2929
2020-21 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 23 25 19 44 1.913 0.2116 0.2116 — —
2021-22 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0592 0.0552 0.1750 0.1633
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 14 3 4 7 0.500
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 22 2 0 2 0.091
2022-23 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 11 2 0 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2022-23 · Wentworth
+157.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23137
Forward overall
#1147
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Cerepak
Bowdoin · 2021-22
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Kile
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trey Bagwell
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.