← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Cerepak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Choate Rosemary Hall NE-Prep 22 3 1 4 0.182 0.0349 0.0349 0.0828 0.0828
2019-20 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 6 5 11 0.393 0.0754 0.0754 0.1790 0.1790
2020-21 Northern Cyclones NCDC 20 3 6 9 0.450 0.1040 0.1040 0.3626 0.3626
2021-22 NCDC 41 12 17 29 0.707 0.1635 0.1520 0.5699 0.5299
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 19 0 3 3 0.158
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 21 4 8 12 0.571
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 24 1 8 9 0.375
2022-23 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 13 1 2 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2022-23 · Bowdoin
+122.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17464
Forward overall
#820
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2011-12
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.