← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teddy Lagerback Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.2547 0.2720 1.1987 1.2802
2019-20 Minnetonka USHS-MN 27 19 18 37 1.370 0.3689 0.3689 0.7492 0.7492
2020-21 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 41 5 3 8 0.195 0.1242 0.1242 0.5847 0.5847
2021-22 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 54 25 24 49 0.907 0.3532 0.3308 1.3233 1.2395
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 31 4 11 15 0.484
2024-25 Stonehill D1 19 6 6 12 0.632
2023-24 Miami D1 NCHC 22 1 1 2 0.091
2022-23 Arizona State D1 NCHC 30 5 2 7 0.233
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2022-23 · Arizona State
-21.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11684
Forward overall
#351
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2017-18
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2011-12
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.