← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Kaminski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Gillette Wild NA3HL 45 10 18 28 0.622 0.0750 0.0839 0.1966 0.2198
2019-20 Gillette Wild NA3HL 42 11 25 36 0.857 0.1033 0.1033 0.2708 0.2708
2020-21 Northeast Generals NA3HL 33 5 22 27 0.818 0.0986 0.0986
2021-22 Northeast Generals NAHL 32 0 1 1 0.031 0.0116 0.0115 0.0330 0.0326
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 46 1 4 5 0.109 0.0404 0.0379 0.1151 0.1081
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Boston D3 JR 21 0 1 1 0.048
2024-25 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 20 0 3 3 0.150
2023-24 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 10 3 1 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · UMass Boston
+1609.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#53710
Forward overall
#2849
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trine · 2016-17
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Northland · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.