← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Bisson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 28 9 16 25 0.893 0.2404 0.2404 0.2169 0.2169
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 NAHL 37 4 6 10 0.270 0.1071 0.1091 0.2838 0.2890
2022-23 NAHL 58 14 9 23 0.397 0.1571 0.1523 0.4164 0.4035
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 28 9 11 20 0.714
2024-25 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 20 10 3 13 0.650
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 24 3 7 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · Saint John's
+260.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31178
Forward overall
#1835
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2008-09
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.