← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Morris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Neepawa Titans MJHL 45 2 8 10 0.222 0.0428 0.0428 0.1400 0.1400
2020-21 Neepawa Titans MJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 60 11 44 55 0.917 0.3256 0.3247 0.9624 0.9597
2022-23 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 58 13 45 58 1.000 0.3552 0.3368 1.0499 0.9954
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA GR 10 0 2 2 0.200
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 21 3 4 7 0.333
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 19 2 5 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2023-24 · St. Norbert
+29.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14785
Forward overall
#752
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.