← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ronan Walsh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 32 22 21 43 1.344 0.3791 0.3791 0.6149 0.6149
2019-20 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 27 12 17 29 1.074 0.3030 0.3030 0.4915 0.4915
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 19 6 3 9 0.474 0.2641 0.2641 0.3830 0.3830
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 44 21 12 33 0.750 0.2972 0.2951 0.7874 0.7820
2022-23 NAHL 60 16 13 29 0.483 0.1915 0.1808 0.5074 0.4790
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast 15 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22233
Forward overall
#1226
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.