IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Casey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 29 3 7 10 0.345 0.0665 0.0665 0.1578 0.1578
2021-22 — NAHL 50 11 18 29 0.580 0.2060 0.2080 0.6089 0.6150
2022-23 — NAHL 60 11 22 33 0.550 0.1954 0.1877 0.5774 0.5548
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Endicott D3 CNE GR 28 8 10 18 0.643
2024-25 Endicott D3 CNE SR 28 6 17 23 0.821
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 7 14 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2023-24 · Endicott
+364.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31338
Forward overall
#1847
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tanner Spink
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kent Bostrom
Bethel · 2004-05
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Schrotenboer
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.