IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan McGuire Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 30 8 13 21 0.700 0.1387 0.1387 0.7509 0.8369
2019-20 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 30 20 13 33 1.100 0.2179 0.2179 — —
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 17 4 6 10 0.588 0.2266 0.2266 0.8560 0.8560
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast — 37 4 3 7 0.189
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 34 14 12 26 0.765
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 40 4 6 10 0.250
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 37 1 3 4 0.108
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2021-22 · Colgate
-32.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
62%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21989
Forward overall
#1189
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Declan House
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Lund
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.