← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Ireland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 41 12 6 18 0.439 0.2448 0.2628 0.3550 0.3811
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 48 15 22 37 0.771 0.4298 0.4298 0.6233 0.6233
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 42 28 20 48 1.143 0.6373 0.6373 0.9241 0.9241
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 41 11 12 23 0.561 0.2223 0.2070 0.5890 0.5486
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 AHA SR 28 2 7 9 0.321
2022-23 Stonehill D2 NE10 25 17 27 44 1.760
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.76
2022-23 · Stonehill
+796.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8478
Forward overall
#345
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.