← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 58 9 14 23 0.397 0.1457 0.1477 0.4186 0.4244
2022-23 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 40 5 9 14 0.350 0.1286 0.1241 0.3694 0.3564
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 23 12 6 18 0.783
2024-25 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 23 12 6 18 0.783
2023-24 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 23 12 6 18 0.783
2022-23 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 23 12 6 18 0.783
2021-22 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 23 12 6 18 0.783
2020-21 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 23 12 6 18 0.783

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37090
Forward overall
#2267
Forward born in 2002
#3819
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.