← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Malinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lakeville South USHS-MN 30 9 15 24 0.800 0.1013 0.1013 0.1943 0.1943
2020-21 Lakeville South USHS-MN 23 7 23 30 1.304 0.1651 0.1651 0.3168 0.3168
2021-22 Austin Bruins NAHL 55 5 16 21 0.382 0.1403 0.1403 0.4030 0.4030
2022-23 Austin Bruins NAHL 51 4 36 40 0.784 0.2882 0.2741 0.8278 0.7872
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 23 1 9 10 0.435
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 15 0 1 1 0.067
2023-24 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 26 2 4 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2023-24 · Vermont
+10.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3867
Defenseman overall
#1006
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.