← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tony Leahy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Roseville USHS-MN 26 21 19 40 1.538 0.1895 0.1895 0.3737 0.3737
2020-21 Roseville USHS-MN 19 16 18 34 1.790 0.2205 0.2205 0.4347 0.4347
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 57 10 10 20 0.351 0.1246 0.1273 0.3684 0.3764
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 59 12 15 27 0.458 0.1625 0.1580 0.4804 0.4672
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Olaf D3 MIAC GR 23 4 8 12 0.522
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 26 3 9 12 0.462
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 28 4 5 9 0.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2023-24 · St. Olaf
+157.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22881
Forward overall
#1273
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2003-04
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.