IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Duke Kiffin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minnetonka USHS-MN 27 4 13 17 0.630 0.0797 0.0797 0.1529 0.1529
2020-21 Minnetonka USHS-MN 19 2 15 17 0.895 0.1133 0.1133 0.2173 0.2173
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 54 3 11 14 0.259 0.0953 0.0972 0.2737 0.2792
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 60 2 23 25 0.417 0.1531 0.1486 0.4398 0.4269
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC GR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 25 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 26 0 5 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2023-24 · Augsburg
+59.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9486
Defenseman overall
#2055
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Swanson
Concordia · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Thompson
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.767 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Love
New England College · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.