← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason McCormick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 26 1 0 1 0.038 0.0237 0.0250 0.1134 0.1197
2019-20 NAHL 35 4 12 16 0.457 0.1811 0.1811 0.4799 0.4799
2020-21 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 46 7 15 22 0.478 0.1895 0.1895 0.5022 0.5022
2021-22 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 46 7 9 16 0.348 0.2138 0.1936 1.0247 0.9277
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA SR 28 7 9 16 0.571
2024-25 Air Force D1 AHA JR 35 5 5 10 0.286
2023-24 Air Force D1 AHA SO 38 6 9 15 0.395
2022-23 Air Force D1 AHA FR 34 6 2 8 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2022-23 · Air Force
+117.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28398
Forward overall
#1485
Forward born in 2001
#2733
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.