IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Mitchell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kemptville 73's CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Kemptville 73's CCHL 56 2 10 12 0.214 0.0684 0.0684 0.1659 0.1659
2020-21 Kemptville 73's CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 51 0 13 13 0.255 0.1010 0.0992 0.2676 0.2629
2022-23 Blackfalds Bulldogs AJHL 15 2 4 6 0.400 0.1327 0.1209 0.3707 0.3377
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC GR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15782
Defenseman overall
#2852
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Seaverson
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.452 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Carter
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Miles
Salem State · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.