← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Carter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1926 0.2043 0.7277 0.7721
2007-08 BCHL 35 3 9 12 0.343 0.1321 0.1330 0.4990 0.5025
2008-09 MJHL 31 3 10 13 0.419 0.0807 0.0779 0.2645 0.2555
2009-10 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 13 5 6 11 0.846 0.3260 0.2968 1.2315 1.1213
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Finlandia D3 FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#27065
Forward overall
#903
Forward born in 1989
#1452
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.