| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.1862 | 0.1976 | 0.7286 | 0.7730 |
| 2007-08 | — | BCHL | 35 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.343 | 0.1277 | 0.1286 | 0.4996 | 0.5031 |
| 2008-09 | — | MJHL | 31 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.419 | 0.1140 | 0.1101 | 0.2643 | 0.2553 |
| 2009-10 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 13 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.846 | 0.3152 | 0.2870 | 1.2330 | 1.1227 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Finlandia | D3 | — | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.