IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke De Vries Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 52 3 9 12 0.231 0.0820 0.0872 0.2423 0.2577
2022-23 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 55 6 21 27 0.491 0.1744 0.1769 0.5154 0.5229
2023-24 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 41 2 19 21 0.512 0.1819 0.1758 0.5378 0.5199
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA — 22 5 14 19 0.864
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA — 13 0 5 5 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2024-25 · Trine
+131.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9899
Defenseman overall
#2157
Defenseman born in 2003
#3501
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeffrey Beck
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Dillon
Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Roo
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.