IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Philip Quetell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 46 2 8 10 0.217 0.0502 0.0502 0.1758 0.1758
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 28 1 4 5 0.179 0.0413 0.0413 0.1444 0.1444
2021-22 — NAHL 41 6 4 10 0.244 0.0866 0.0818 0.2561 0.2420
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 23 2 8 10 0.435
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 25 2 11 13 0.520
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 17 1 3 4 0.235
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 15 0 4 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Lake Forest
+281.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45912
Forward overall
#2682
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Brown
Bethel · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Meier
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Elliott
Hamilton · 2000-01
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.