IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 East Ridge USHS-MN 26 11 28 39 1.500 0.4038 0.4038 0.3644 0.3644
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 43 11 10 21 0.488 0.1813 0.1813 0.5171 0.5171
2021-22 — NAHL 58 12 20 32 0.552 0.2048 0.1935 0.5841 0.5518
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 26 4 8 12 0.462
2024-25 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 26 8 12 20 0.769
2023-24 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 26 7 9 16 0.615
2022-23 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Bethel
+85.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15379
Forward overall
#497
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luc Boby
Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.