← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Zimmerman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.0457 0.0457 0.1052 0.1052
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 12 1 5 6 0.500 0.1837 0.1804 0.5278 0.5184
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 20 4 6 10 0.500
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 25 5 10 15 0.600
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 26 5 9 14 0.538
2022-23 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 24 7 16 23 0.958
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2022-23 · Hamilton
+784.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37609
Forward overall
#2318
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.