IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-24 Country: USA
Lawrence
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lakeville South USHS-MN 29 3 7 10 0.345 0.0437 0.0437 0.0838 0.0838
2020-21 Lakeville South USHS-MN 23 4 14 18 0.783 0.0991 0.0991 0.1901 0.1901
2021-22 Chippewa Steel NAHL 11 0 6 6 0.545 0.2004 0.2113 0.5758 0.6071
2022-23 Chippewa Steel NAHL 51 1 8 9 0.176 0.0648 0.0651 0.1863 0.1873
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10096
Defenseman overall
#2178
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Alexander Hollands
0.27
actual FR PPG at Lawrence
Jordan Boehlke
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lawrence
Jordan Cooper
0.25
actual FR PPG at Lawrence
Shane Noviello
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Kons
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Frédéric D'Amours
Manhattanville · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Bitz
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.