← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Cooper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 40 9 7 16 0.400 0.0482 0.0504 0.1264 0.1323
2017-18 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 43 16 17 33 0.767 0.0925 0.0921 0.2424 0.2414
2018-19 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 46 13 20 33 0.717 0.0864 0.0815 0.2266 0.2137
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA GR 15 0 2 2 0.133
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 23 5 2 7 0.304
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 18 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 8 1 0 1 0.125
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 12 2 1 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · Lawrence
+240.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43408
Forward overall
#2045
Forward born in 1998
#1767
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.