← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Cooper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 40 9 7 16 0.400 0.0502 0.0525 0.1263 0.1322
2017-18 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 43 16 17 33 0.767 0.0963 0.0959 0.2423 0.2413
2018-19 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 46 13 20 33 0.717 0.0900 0.0849 0.2265 0.2136
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA GR 15 0 2 2 0.133
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 23 5 2 7 0.304
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 18 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 8 1 0 1 0.125
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 8 1 0 1 0.125
2019-20 Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 12 2 1 3 0.250
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 12 2 1 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · Lawrence
+227.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36446
Forward overall
#1859
Forward born in 1998
#1637
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.