IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Bowes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 34 7 2 9 0.265 0.1030 0.1073 0.3860 0.4022
2013-14 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 38 5 11 16 0.421 0.1564 0.1574 0.4459 0.4487
2014-15 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 51 4 10 14 0.275 0.1019 0.0972 0.2906 0.2772
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE SR 26 19 22 41 1.577
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 14 15 29 1.074
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE SO 22 12 14 26 1.182
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE FR 27 11 10 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2015-16 · Endicott
+649.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33663
Forward overall
#1388
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Blais
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Gardiner
Southern Maine · 2017-18
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Frary
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.