IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Bowes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 34 7 2 9 0.265 0.1020 0.1063 0.3852 0.4013
2013-14 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 38 5 11 16 0.421 0.1547 0.1557 0.4445 0.4473
2014-15 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 51 4 10 14 0.275 0.1009 0.0963 0.2897 0.2764
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Endicott D1 CNE SR 26 19 22 41 1.577
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE SR 26 19 22 41 1.577
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 14 15 29 1.074
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE SO 22 12 14 26 1.182
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE FR 27 11 10 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2015-16 · Endicott
+656.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41372
Forward overall
#1659
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Juraj Elias
University of New England · 2021-22
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Blais
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Johnson
Hamline · 2005-06
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.