← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Triggs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Moorhead USHS-MN 27 2 5 7 0.259 0.0319 0.0319 0.0630 0.0630
2020-21 Moorhead USHS-MN 22 7 6 13 0.591 0.0728 0.0728 0.1435 0.1435
2021-22 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 8 2 2 4 0.500 0.1776 0.1913 0.5250 0.5656
2022-23 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 54 7 14 21 0.389 0.1381 0.1420 0.4083 0.4198
2023-24 NAHL 43 4 11 15 0.349 0.1239 0.1215 0.3662 0.3591
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC 16 4 10 14 0.875
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24823
Forward overall
#1385
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Michael's College · 2014-15
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.