← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Mara Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0221 0.0248 0.0634 0.0710
2019-20 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 37 5 21 26 0.703 0.0777 0.0777 0.2226 0.2226
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 31 1 2 3 0.097 0.0344 0.0340 0.1016 0.1006
2022-23 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 57 13 17 30 0.526 0.1869 0.1758 0.5526 0.5198
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC GR 2 0 2 2 1.000
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 4 2 0 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Hobart
+390.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24120
Forward overall
#1342
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.