IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Berg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3552 0.3711 1.0499 1.0968
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 39 4 17 21 0.538 0.0788 0.0799 0.2640 0.2676
2023-24 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 40 5 16 21 0.525 0.0768 0.0740 0.2574 0.2479
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nichols D3 CNE SO 16 0 1 1 0.062
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE — 15 0 2 2 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2024-25 · Nichols
+84.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7483
Defenseman overall
#1762
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Heinze
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Doiron
Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Pickering
Canton · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.