← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Bradley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-08-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.0888 0.0939 0.2625 0.2776
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 0 9 9 0.176 0.0627 0.0632 0.1853 0.1869
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 60 1 17 18 0.300 0.1066 0.1024 0.3150 0.3026
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 26 2 7 9 0.346
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 21 1 5 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+248.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17194
Defenseman overall
#3100
Defenseman born in 2003
#5310
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2025-26
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.