IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Grosek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1321 0.1387 0.3499 0.3674
2022-23 — NAHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0264 0.0264 0.0700 0.0701
2023-24 Maine Nordiques NAHL 35 1 1 2 0.057 0.0226 0.0215 0.0599 0.0571
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Miami D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#62540
Forward overall
#4472
Forward born in 2003
#7092
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curtis Heinz
Wentworth · 2010-11
0.158 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Chiasson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Galvez
Lebanon Valley · 2016-17
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.