IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Curtis Heinz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-06-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 32 1 2 3 0.094 0.0345 0.0374 0.0990 0.1073
2008-09 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 47 4 10 14 0.298 0.1094 0.1131 0.3144 0.3251
2009-10 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 44 2 14 16 0.364 0.1336 0.1328 0.3838 0.3815
2010-11 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 58 1 20 21 0.362 0.1330 0.1254 0.3822 0.3604
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 21 0 2 2 0.095
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 26 1 6 7 0.269
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 25 0 11 11 0.440
2011-12 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 19 1 2 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2011-12 · Wentworth
+30.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11844
Defenseman overall
#1396
Defenseman born in 1990
#4057
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Soucy
King's · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bill McGinnis
New England College · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cayden Sweitzer
Post · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.