IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bill McGinnis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-06-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 6 2 1 3 0.500 0.1946 0.2010 0.7291 0.7529
2005-06 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 53 7 7 14 0.264 0.1028 0.1010 0.3853 0.3786
2006-07 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 50 18 25 43 0.860 0.3347 0.3109 1.2541 1.1649
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 26 1 8 9 0.346
2009-10 New England College D3 — JR 13 1 2 3 0.231
2008-09 New England College D3 — SO 21 6 8 14 0.667
2007-08 New England College D3 — FR 24 3 7 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2007-08 · New England College
+114.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15736
Forward overall
#631
Forward born in 1986
#1359
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady Fleurent
New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Hatton
Saint Mary's · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.