← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Senf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0459 0.0480 0.1319 0.1379
2022-23 Dauphin Kings MJHL 55 19 20 39 0.709 0.1365 0.1341 0.4472 0.4395
2023-24 Dauphin Kings MJHL 52 14 22 36 0.692 0.1333 0.1240 0.4366 0.4062
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Mary ACHA_D1 40 21 19 40 1.000
2024-25 University of Mary ACHA_D1 40 21 19 40 1.000
2023-24 University of Mary ACHA_D1 40 21 19 40 1.000
2022-23 University of Mary ACHA_D1 40 21 19 40 1.000
2021-22 University of Mary ACHA_D1 40 21 19 40 1.000
2020-21 University of Mary ACHA_D1 40 21 19 40 1.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29948
Forward overall
#1740
Forward born in 2003
#2691
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2021-22
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2024-25
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2016-17
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.