← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Izenstark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 42 2 19 21 0.500 0.0564 0.0564 0.1701 0.1701
2021-22 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 41 7 21 28 0.683 0.0770 0.0752
2022-23 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 5 24 29 0.659 0.0743 0.0689 0.2242 0.2079
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA GR 16 0 2 2 0.125
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 21 0 4 4 0.191
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 15 1 2 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Lawrence
+196.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6193
Defenseman overall
#1543
Defenseman born in 2002
#2042
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.