IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Stuntz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Texas Tornado NAHL 20 1 2 3 0.150 0.0551 0.0569 0.1583 0.1634
2012-13 Michigan Warriors NAHL 30 6 2 8 0.267 0.0980 0.0962 0.2815 0.2764
2013-14 Michigan Warriors NAHL 58 18 18 36 0.621 0.2280 0.2124 0.6551 0.6103
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 18 0 4 4 0.222
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 22 4 3 7 0.318
2014-15 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 18 3 3 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2014-15 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+134.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34799
Forward overall
#1220
Forward born in 1993
#3451
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Zarudny
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Mohler
Curry · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gramm McCormack
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.