← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tony Eaton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 37 10 15 25 0.676 0.0884 0.0887 0.2293 0.2301
2023-24 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 17 1 4 5 0.294 0.1081 0.1045 0.3104 0.3001
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 13 14 27 0.900
2024-25 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 13 14 27 0.900
2023-24 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 13 14 27 0.900
2022-23 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 13 14 27 0.900
2021-22 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 13 14 27 0.900
2020-21 Calvin University ACHA_D1 30 13 14 27 0.900

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26976
Forward overall
#1526
Forward born in 2003
#2265
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.