IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Humphreys Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Sheridan Hawks NA3HL 20 10 25 35 1.750 0.2196 0.2196 0.5525 0.5525
2021-22 — NA3HL 21 12 15 27 1.286 0.1614 0.1490 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 22 8 11 19 0.864
2025-26 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SR 22 8 11 19 0.864
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 27 15 7 22 0.815
2024-25 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 27 15 7 22 0.815
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 24 10 5 15 0.625
2023-24 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 24 10 6 16 0.667
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 22 2 6 8 0.364
2022-23 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 21 2 4 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · Concordia
+185.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12846
Forward overall
#597
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.