IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Abraham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Houston Bulls NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Houston Bulls NAHL 55 13 12 25 0.455 0.1670 0.1751 0.4797 0.5029
2023-24 — NAHL 51 12 10 22 0.431 0.1585 0.1586 0.4553 0.4555
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 31 14 16 30 0.968
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 31 14 16 30 0.968
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 31 14 16 30 0.968
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 31 14 16 30 0.968
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 31 14 16 30 0.968
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 31 14 16 30 0.968

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32002
Forward overall
#1913
Forward born in 2004
#3021
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Kuzyk
Adrian · 2005-06
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Titanic
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Devine
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.