IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Titanic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 44 7 21 28 0.636 0.1778 0.1883 0.4392 0.4650
2008-09 Markham Waxers OJHL 50 12 27 39 0.780 0.2179 0.2195 0.5383 0.5424
2009-10 Markham Waxers OJHL 48 27 39 66 1.375 0.3842 0.3669 0.9489 0.9062
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 31 9 8 17 0.548
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 30 11 8 19 0.633
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 27 4 6 10 0.370
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 12 3 1 4 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2010-11 · SUNY Oswego
+26.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11649
Forward overall
#506
Forward born in 1990
#597
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2004-05
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Manning
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lee Swallow
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2003-04
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.