IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riku Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 31 11 9 20 0.645 0.0795 0.0795 0.1567 0.1567
2020-21 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 24 8 9 17 0.708 0.0873 0.0873 0.1720 0.1720
2021-22 — NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Austin Bruins NAHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0710 0.0687 0.2100 0.2032
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC GR 17 2 5 7 0.412
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 24 7 3 10 0.417
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19291
Forward overall
#1038
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hadan Jordan
St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Damien Dangueuger
Western New England · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Greenberg
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.