← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riku Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 31 11 9 20 0.645 0.0817 0.0817 0.1567 0.1567
2020-21 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 24 8 9 17 0.708 0.0897 0.0897 0.1720 0.1720
2021-22 NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Austin Bruins NAHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0735 0.0711 0.2111 0.2042
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC GR 17 2 5 7 0.412
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 24 7 3 10 0.417
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17913
Forward overall
#945
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2023-24
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2023-24
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.