IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Blackfalds Bulldogs AJHL 49 17 12 29 0.592 0.1985 0.2028 0.5459 0.5577
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 55 19 14 33 0.600 0.2132 0.2120 0.6329 0.6292
2023-24 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 47 27 25 52 1.106 0.3931 0.3720 1.1670 1.1045
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 33 11 14 25 0.758
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2024-25 · Alaska Anchorage
+187.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14268
Forward overall
#691
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Laganiere
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Gaffney
Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Scorcia
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.