← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Kimmen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Canmore Eagles AJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1677 0.1893 0.4634 0.5232
2019-20 Canmore Eagles AJHL 42 5 4 9 0.214 0.0719 0.0719 0.1986 0.1986
2020-21 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 13 4 4 8 0.615 0.2064 0.2064 0.5704 0.5704
2021-22 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 52 16 16 32 0.615 0.2064 0.2029 0.5704 0.5608
2022-23 NAHL 57 11 14 25 0.439 0.1558 0.1489 0.4605 0.4401
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nichols D3 CNE GR 25 6 7 13 0.520
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE SR 14 2 3 5 0.357
2023-24 Nichols D3 CNE JR 18 2 2 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · Nichols
+52.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29634
Forward overall
#1734
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.