← New Search ↗ Social Card

Weston Knox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Andover USHS-MN 23 2 7 9 0.391 0.0495 0.0495 0.0950 0.0950
2020-21 Andover USHS-MN 22 4 23 27 1.227 0.1554 0.1554 0.2981 0.2981
2021-22 Andover USHS-MN 31 6 24 30 0.968 0.1225 0.1225 0.2351 0.2351
2022-23 Minot Minotauros NAHL 47 6 16 22 0.468 0.1720 0.1789 0.4941 0.5140
2023-24 Minot Minotauros NAHL 52 5 19 24 0.462 0.1696 0.1683 0.4871 0.4835
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 20 1 5 6 0.300
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 11 0 3 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2024-25 · Wisconsin
+67.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6655
Defenseman overall
#1621
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keene State · 2022-23
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2017-18
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.