IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Weston Knox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Andover USHS-MN 23 2 7 9 0.391 0.1053 0.1053 0.0950 0.0950
2020-21 Andover USHS-MN 22 4 23 27 1.227 0.3304 0.3304 0.2981 0.2981
2021-22 Andover USHS-MN 31 6 24 30 0.968 0.2605 0.2605 0.2351 0.2351
2022-23 Minot Minotauros NAHL 47 6 16 22 0.468 0.1855 0.1930 0.4915 0.5113
2023-24 Minot Minotauros NAHL 52 5 19 24 0.462 0.1828 0.1814 0.4845 0.4809
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 20 1 5 6 0.300
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 BigTen — 11 0 3 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2024-25 · Wisconsin
+55.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6580
Defenseman overall
#1625
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Leimbrock
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derrick Budz
Aurora · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Bradley
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.